<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Conquistadors And The Corporate Rape Of Araucania And Patagonia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Wilson</title>
		<link>http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Joe,

You bring up an interesting point. Others have contacted me, saying similar things about Barrick as well. And, I certainly hope they will do the right thing.

I am not really an anti-Canadian or Corporate bashing radical as some seem to think, but rather, when I write about something with the goal of making people aware of a situation, I use many methods to get my point across. One way is shock, another shame, and finger pointing makes people react.

I apologize to the many Canadians who might be offended by my admittedly sensationalistic headline, but of more concern to me is making people everywhere stop and think and act more ethically with regards to the indigenous people of South America---the Mapuche in particular. I have traveled to Canada a few times, and even have a couple Canadian friends. Really like it.

And, I did point out other countries that are at fault as well. I should even point out Israel has helped the Chilean government by supplying them militarily...so blame can be spread far and wide. But, blame is useless. Shaming someone to right a wrong however, has its uses. And so, I hope you are right about Barrick, and I hope they will change their policy and methods.

Corporate responsibility goes beyond simply engaging in good business practices, however. And American and other corporations from all over the world need to be shamed occasionally into doing the right thing if that is what it takes.

Thanks for stopping by and commenting. If Barrick does the right thing in this particular case, I will most certainly post anew and laud them for their efforts and acknowledge their choice to do what they should have done in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>You bring up an interesting point. Others have contacted me, saying similar things about Barrick as well. And, I certainly hope they will do the right thing.</p>
<p>I am not really an anti-Canadian or Corporate bashing radical as some seem to think, but rather, when I write about something with the goal of making people aware of a situation, I use many methods to get my point across. One way is shock, another shame, and finger pointing makes people react.</p>
<p>I apologize to the many Canadians who might be offended by my admittedly sensationalistic headline, but of more concern to me is making people everywhere stop and think and act more ethically with regards to the indigenous people of South America&#8212;the Mapuche in particular. I have traveled to Canada a few times, and even have a couple Canadian friends. Really like it.</p>
<p>And, I did point out other countries that are at fault as well. I should even point out Israel has helped the Chilean government by supplying them militarily&#8230;so blame can be spread far and wide. But, blame is useless. Shaming someone to right a wrong however, has its uses. And so, I hope you are right about Barrick, and I hope they will change their policy and methods.</p>
<p>Corporate responsibility goes beyond simply engaging in good business practices, however. And American and other corporations from all over the world need to be shamed occasionally into doing the right thing if that is what it takes.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and commenting. If Barrick does the right thing in this particular case, I will most certainly post anew and laud them for their efforts and acknowledge their choice to do what they should have done in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>With regard to Barrick Gold, the case outlined in the Washington Post is unfortunate indeed, but I am confident Barrick will do the right thing in the end, whatever that may be.
I do take issue with your statement that this is a "morally decrepit company". I'm not sure how much reading you did, but Barrick is frequently recognized as a leader in socially responsible practices and sustainable development around the world. Just this year the Canadian International Development Agency (our version of USAID) gave Barrick the Award for Excellence in Corporate Social and Ethical Responsibility at its International Cooperation Days Conference. The award specifically recognized projects in Latin America. Anyway, there are a lot of bad companies out there in Canada and elsewhere. But truly, Barrick is not one of them and I hope you’ll reconsider your opinion in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to Barrick Gold, the case outlined in the Washington Post is unfortunate indeed, but I am confident Barrick will do the right thing in the end, whatever that may be.<br />
I do take issue with your statement that this is a &#8220;morally decrepit company&#8221;. I&#8217;m not sure how much reading you did, but Barrick is frequently recognized as a leader in socially responsible practices and sustainable development around the world. Just this year the Canadian International Development Agency (our version of USAID) gave Barrick the Award for Excellence in Corporate Social and Ethical Responsibility at its International Cooperation Days Conference. The award specifically recognized projects in Latin America. Anyway, there are a lot of bad companies out there in Canada and elsewhere. But truly, Barrick is not one of them and I hope you’ll reconsider your opinion in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Wilson</title>
		<link>http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>That's the beauty of diversity---we can all disagree and still, occasionally, get along. No, Americans aren't exempt. In fact, I point that out in the post; and, the ONLY person named---other than the author of the article that inspired my blog on the topic---was a rich American billionaire who could sue me into poverty for taking issue with his character.

I sometimes use an off angle approach to get my point across. I hope you'll notice I pointed out many of the good things in Canadian society, for example. Most people don't want to read "(insert your native country here) Is Destroying The Earth" type headlines. However, if they see something about a neighboring country who's society is not dissimilar, they may stop to take a look and I thereby make my point to one more reader I might not otherwise have been able to reach.

Now, since Canadians are known the whole world over as really, really nice, it only served to make my task so much easier. There is something to be said for sensationalism when trying to grow a blog.

Thanks for stopping by.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the beauty of diversity&#8212;we can all disagree and still, occasionally, get along. No, Americans aren&#8217;t exempt. In fact, I point that out in the post; and, the ONLY person named&#8212;other than the author of the article that inspired my blog on the topic&#8212;was a rich American billionaire who could sue me into poverty for taking issue with his character.</p>
<p>I sometimes use an off angle approach to get my point across. I hope you&#8217;ll notice I pointed out many of the good things in Canadian society, for example. Most people don&#8217;t want to read &#8220;(insert your native country here) Is Destroying The Earth&#8221; type headlines. However, if they see something about a neighboring country who&#8217;s society is not dissimilar, they may stop to take a look and I thereby make my point to one more reader I might not otherwise have been able to reach.</p>
<p>Now, since Canadians are known the whole world over as really, really nice, it only served to make my task so much easier. There is something to be said for sensationalism when trying to grow a blog.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvin Parisian</title>
		<link>http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin Parisian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://errantmind.wordpress.com/2007/01/06/33/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I agree with some of your opinions . People all through time have been exploited and ripped off. You Americans are not exempt . Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with some of your opinions . People all through time have been exploited and ripped off. You Americans are not exempt . Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
